By: Samuel B. Johnson
MONROVIA, LIBERIA - A growing trend in Liberian politics has sparked heated debate among citizens and civil society groups: the transition of advocacy groups and individuals from watchdog roles to political office. While some see it as a natural progression, others argue that it undermines the legitimacy of both advocacy and politics.
According to Cllr. Kanio Bai Gbala, Assistant Professor of Law at the Louis Arthur Grimes School of Law, this trend poses significant risks to democratic integrity. "When advocates abandon their roles to become political candidates, they risk eroding the legitimacy of both advocacy and politics," Gbala argues.
Examples of this trend can be seen in other African countries. In Kenya, anti-corruption activist Boniface Mwangi ran for parliamentary and presidential seats, sparking accusations of opportunism. In South Africa, HIV and social justice campaigner Zackie Achmat stood as an independent candidate, raising questions about the role of activists in politics.
In Liberia, Senator Darius Dillon, once a vocal advocate for reform, has faced criticism for appearing to prioritize political office over principled critique. Meanwhile, Martin Kollie, a self-styled "exiled activist," has been positioning himself for a potential senatorial bid in 2025, further fueling concerns about the motivations behind advocacy.
Gbala argues that this trend breeds hypocrisy and undermines democratic integrity. "When everyone seeks to become a politician, society is left with fewer independent monitors and moral voices," he warns.
As the country heads towards the 2025 elections, citizens are left to ponder the implications of this trend. Will the transition of advocates to politicians strengthen or weaken Liberia's democracy? Only time will tell.
About the Author
